So you want to answer the phone call for Papers? It provides recommendations for this content and presentation of the abstract, as well as types of the best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the subject you desire to present at the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the historical literature. It is almost always restricted to 250-500 words. The term limit could be challenging: some graduate students usually do not fret throughout the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract during the eleventh hour, which often hurts their chances of being accepted; other students you will need to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, and this can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most often invited to present their research. For those who are intimidated by the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Proceed with the basic guidelines below and steer clear of common pitfalls and you’ll greatly boost your abstract.
Diligently follow all abstract style and formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, and perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, simple tips to present quotes, how to present authors and works, whether or not to include footnotes or not. Be sure that you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP will not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things and don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make sure that you orient your topic that is abstract to any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what exactly is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and look closely at excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address listed here questions: What is the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you will be using primary source material. How exactly does your paper fit into the historiography? What’s going on in the area of study and how does your paper donate to it? Why does it matter? We understand the subject is important for you, why should it is crucial that you the abstract selection committee?
You ought to be as specific as you are able to, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you ought to say and absolutely nothing more.
Keep your audience in mind. How much background you give on a topic depends on the conference. May be the conference a broad humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch must be worthy of the specificity regarding the conference: the more specific this issue, the less background that is broad need certainly to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can also be the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you should be tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to learn your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language should always be professional and your style should adhere to academic standards. Contractions might be appealing due to the expressed word limits, nonetheless they must certanly be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to utilize the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) in the text as opposed to use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, may be posed in your abstract, you need to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). When you do pose a concern or two, make certain you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an obvious rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there. A lot of questions takes up too much space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you’re not expected to have already written your conference paper, you are anticipated to have done enough research that you are prepared to write on a particular topic that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that can help you be as specific as you are able to in presenting your argument is excellent but don’t ensure you get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll be reading lots of abstracts and won’t wish to wade through the language that essaywritersite.com/ is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they are performing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on the argument. Contemplate it a few more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Make certain each sentence is exclusive and that it plays a part in the flow of your abstract.
The abstract committee does not require to be reminded for the grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically in the historiography.
The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with the samples below were subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented in the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a review that is peer before publication.
Categories: College Essay Writing Services